Friday, 9 April 2021

The Best Films of 2020

It's that time of the year again and the same deal as usual, although with a changes to the normal running of things. Because this year has been a bit different.


All the films had to be released in someway either cinemas or on streaming before the end of April 2021, which unfortunately means that a lot of the big awards contenders won't appear in the Stuie's as it has been nigh on impossible to see most of them.


So, without anymore waiting around, let's get on with it.


7. Rocks

Writer: Theresa Ikoko and Claire Wilson

Director: Sarah Gavron

Runtime: 93 minutes

Language: English


6. Proxima

Writer: Alice Winocour and Jean-Stephane Bron

Director: Alice Winocour

Runtime: 107 minutes

Languages: French, English, German and Russian


5. Tenet

Writer: Christopher Nolan

Director: Christopher Nolan

Runtime: 150 minutes

Languages: English


4. Judas and the Black Messiah

Writer: Shaka King (screenplay and story), Will Berson (screenplay and story), Kenneth & Keith Lucas (story)

Director: Shaka King

Runtime: 126 minutes

Languages: English


3. Queen & Slim

Writer: Lena Waither (screenplay and story) and James Frey (story)

Director: Melina Matsoukas

Runtime: 132 minutes

Language: English


2. Portrait of a Lady on Fire

Writer: Celine Sciamma

Director: Celine Sciamma

Runtime: 122 minutes

Languages: French and Italian


1. Saint Maud

Writer: Rose Glass

Director: Rose Glass

Runtime: 84 minutes

Languages: English and Welsh

Saturday, 28 March 2020

The Best Films of 2019

It’s that time of the year again. The 2019 Stuie Awards. Have a quick a look then get watching, we’ve got a bit more time on our hands at the moment.

7. Knives Out
Directed by: Rian Johnson
Written by: Rain Johnson
Run Time: 131 minutes
Language: English

6. Ash is Purest White
Directed by: Zhangke Jia
Written by: Zhangke Jia
Run Time: 136 minutes
Language: Chinese and Mandarin

5. The Farewell
Directed by: Lulu Wang
Written by: Lulu Wang
Run Time: 100 minutes
Language: Mandarin, English, Japanese and Italian.

4. The Irishman
Directed by: Martin Scorsese
Written by: Steve Zaillian (screenplay) and Charles Brandt (Book)
Run Time: 209 minutes
Language: English

3. Sorry To Bother You
Directed by: Boots Riley
Written by: Boots Riley
Run Time: 112 minutes
Language: English

2. Parasite
Directed by: Bong Joon Ho
Written by: Bong Joon Ho (story and screenplay) and Jin Won Han (screenplay)
Run Time: 132 minutes
Language: Korean

1. The Candidate
Directed by: Rodrigo Sorogoyen
Written by: Isabel Pena and Rodrigo Sorogoyen
Run Time: 132 minutes
Language: Spanish (Original Title:: The Realm)

Friday, 17 May 2019

A whole lot of nothing: Manchester United's 2018/2019 season.

I’ve written before about a cavalry coming over the hills to save Manchester United. Sadly, whatever kind of cavalry there was, was snuffed out in a similar way to a horseback charge in a recent Game of Thrones episode.

And like those torches, this season, which quickly turned into a endless dark abyss, was turned around for a brief moments of hope, before once again, poor planning and poor-to-embarrassing performances led to the season being snuffed out.

Now, let’s move on from the Game of Thrones comparisons and get on with what I’m here to do. Look at what went wrong and then put forward a solution or plan for the coming season. While, you may disagree with a lot of what I’m saying, it’s still probably more thought out than the clubs current plan of stumbling around in the darkness worrying more about how much money you’ve got in your wallet, than the giant stomping its way towards you.

The year that was:

The season was very much like a gluten-free sandwich. An interesting and exciting middle, stuck in between two large pieces of something so bland and uninspiring that you just want it over with. Bar the brief period between mid-December and mid-March, when United offered up entertaining performances and an unbeaten run, with the result in Paris proving to be the undeniable highlight of the season. But apart from that, all we were treated to was slow, pedestrian football, that proved to be toothless and easy to counter. This, combined with lazy performances, player tantrums and shambolic displays will be how this season is remembered.

What this season showed, especially during the tougher times, was that a lot of these players struggle to adapt and look to others to get them out of the hole that they have dug for themselves by rolling over and letting the opposition dominate the game. Simply put, they seem to lack any level of mental strength.

Tactically, the team has played very narrowly in the oppositions half. This is a common issue with inverted wingers and fullbacks not getting forward enough in support. Our play was funnelled through the middle, creating bottle necks where the opposition could easily manage our attacks. Then, when the team did use the wings, it was nearly always down the left side, which would create a significant imbalance in the team. This was no doubt due to Pogba favouring that side, but also because Martial, Rashford and Lingard would invariably drift to that side, leaving the right side ineffective offensively and exposed defensively. Mourinho did try and rectify this, with his interest in Ivan Perisic during the summer of 2018, but was knocked back by the club hierachy. Perisic would have offered a hard working wideman, comfortable on the right which would have brought much needed balance to the team.

Next Season:

Next season, needs to be approached with a set of achievable targets and realise the level where we currently are. We are not going to challenge for the Premier League, we have slipped so far, that now, top 4 is what we are aiming for and quite frankly, what we should be aiming for. This will likely affect the level of players will come to us.

The team needs to get back to a consistent performance level, with the League being the priority. Our squad isn’t head and shoulders above the majority of the other teams in the Europa League like it was when we won it back in 2017, so getting back into the Champions League via the Europa League, isn’t as sure a thing as it was back then.

But the biggest target/goal that the management team need to hit, is to improve the mental strength of the team and stop them downing tools or not even turning up to games. This, above all else, would significantly improve the chances of the team outworking the opposition and maybe just, possibly, get back to winning games.

Tactics:

Last season, I’m pretty sure that we saw United employ most of the commonly used formations. It was the early diamond formation (4-1-2-1-2) formation that got Solskjaer the most success. However, going forward, I don’t think that this is the formation that best suits the team. Because, as previously mentioned, it funnels the team into the middle of the pitch and puts a large amount of emphasis on the fullbacks providing all of the width, which often ends with the front four or five players, at least this season, being easily marked.

Relying on width from your defenders, could work, but it would be better suited by deploying a back three (3-5-2) and relieving some of the defensive responsibility from the full/wing backs and pushing them forward more consistently, so that the opposition defence is stretched more often throughout the game, causing the oppositions midfield to drop deeper to compensate.

But this would rely on two clinical centre forwards being deployed, something that United don’t have in the first team at the moment.

The formation I suspect we will see next year is a 4-3-3, due to both it’s offensive and defensive flexibility and it’s ability to stretch teams, when wingers keep their width and are supported by energetic full backs. But also, it offers enough bodies in midfield to both control the game and get forward in support of the lone centre forward.

Recruitment:

Now, the area that year after year spawns endless twitter posts and articles. The transfer activity of Manchester United.

We’ll start with the departures, as of writing Herrera and Valencia have confirmed they are leaving. It looks as though Juan Mata and Matteo Darmian will leave when there contracts expire in the summer.

As for who should be sold, there could be any number of parameters applied to this squad . But quite simply, we’ve got to the stage where it comes down to whether or not a player is capable of performing at the level required.

By category:
Goalkeepers: No departures.
Defenders: Smalling, Jones, Young and Rojo.
Midfielders: Matic and Lingard.
Attackers: Sanchez, Lukaku and one of Martial or Rashford on loan.

So yeah, a lot of the first team could be gotten rid of and I don’t think that there are many who could complain. There are some that could have ended up on this list, but didn’t get enough game time. Also, all players out on loan have been kept.

While not all of these players could be replaced externally as the cost would be prohibitive, especially as a number of players who could have generated a fee if sold, had their contract not been allowed to run down and leave for nothing, there are still enough players from the u23’s who could move up and  take the place of those that aren’t.

Positions:

Centre Back:

Lindelof has established himself as the one centre back who is capable of playing in this team, able to defend and also play, or carry the ball forward. So, one of the first additions must be someone to partner him. With Tuanzebe coming back off a successful season, an experienced addition is needed so that long term Tuanzebe can transition into being a first team player. So long as he continues to develop.
While there are a number of options out there, the player who I would go for is Toby Alderweireld. He was linked with United last year, but went nowhere due to disagreements between Mourinho and Woodward allegedly. At 30 years of age, he would hopefully be able to come and establish a dependable relationship with Lindelof, whilst also bringing some much needed experience in the short term.

Right Back:

Right back has long been an issue for the club, with makeshift solutions deployed from as long ago as Louis Van Gaal’s second season. While Diogo Dalot was bought for the future, he has struggled to feature and is much better going forward than he is defending, opening up once again the need for someone who can come in with some experience and ability, who will take the burden off Dalot so that he can develop over the next season or two.
So once again, I’d go Belgian, this time Thomas Meunier of PSG as a first choice, a versatile right back as capable going forward as he is defending. He’d also bring in title winning experience, something that has largely been lost from this current squad.

Midfielder:

The midfield and the recruitment needed there could get very complicated, depending on whether Paul Pogba stays. I for one, want him to stay and to have a team of players that are closer to his level built around him. Not for him, but around him. So, if we stays I’ll outline one option and if he stays, I’ll outline a second option, but both of these options will feel the effect of not being in the Champions League next year.

Both of these options rely on Fred playing as the most defensively minded of the three midfielders.

Pogba stays. We shouldn’t be buying midielders who compliment him, we should be buying great players who are dangerous and effective in their own right. Which is why I’d go for Ivan Rakitic, with the signing of De Jong and the emergence of Arthur, he may actually be available. He’s a complete midfielder who is comfortable on the ball, can help to dictate tempo and covers a lot of ground. He was on a lot of United wishlist’s when he was at Sevilla, but wisely chose Barcelona and went on to win a host of league titles and cups. If he would step down, and it is a step down, to United is another thing.

If Pogba goes you need to bring in two imposing midfielders who can get up and down the pitch, control the game and score. Easier said than done. So, if he goes, the one plus would that you’d probably get a fair bit of money for Pogba, which should be reinvested into the squad and Pogba’s direct replacement. So, hopefully, we’d have Rakitic as one of the two further forward midfielders, in a role similar to the one he currently occupies at Barcelona and then alongside him, I’d hope on bringing in Thiago Alcantara from Bayern, he’s the one midfielder I’d happily chuck silly amounts of money at in an utterly desperate plea to get him here. He is world class and in his prime, which makes it unlikely, probably the most unlikely of all the options I’ll put forward.

But Thiago would bring something we have needed for years, a midfielder who can dictate the pace of a game and can play the killer pass and open up a deep and well organized defence and again, would bring a winning attitude and experience of playing in high pressure games and being mentally capable of coping with them.

Wingers:

Wingers. Proper Wingers, who can go either side and can cross the ball and score are a dying art. The majority of teams play with inverted wingers, usually quick forwards who weren’t good enough to cut it through the middle. So, all that, plus being happy not to play in the Champions League for a year (hopefully), means we aren’t looking for much at all.
We’ve been linked with Jadon Sancho, but that currently looks like an expensive pipedream with us having no Champions League football to offer.. Alternatively, there is the Bayern Munich pair of Douglas Costa and Kingsley Coman, but with them going through a rebuild as well, it could be hard to pry them away.

So, if I’m going to go for someone for the right wing it would be Kingsley Coman, the big snag is that he’s at Bayern and could be difficult to pry away as he undoubtedly has the potential to become a real world beater. Capable of playing on both wings and beating players at will.

In the likely event of not being to able to get Coman, I’d go for another player who plays his trade in the Bundesliga, Julian Brandt of Bayer Leverkusen.

On the left wing, I’d go for a natural left footer, once again from the Bundesliga, in Bayer Leverkusen’s Leon Bailey. Quick and able to cross, like the hopeful arrival of Coman (or Brandt) on the other side, he’d be able to stretch the defence both in terms of width and pace, freeing up more space centrally for the midfield to work.

The ideal for the left wing would be Ousmane Dembele of Barcelona, but unless they suddenly need to raise a ton of cash to fund the De Jong transfer as well as potentially ones for Greizmann and De Ligt, that transfer would be nigh on impossible.

Centre Forward:

Another player who was linked with United previously, a few years ago during the summer of 2017, when we were reportedly “interested” in three different forwards and ended up signing Romelu Lukaku. But this summer, I’d bring in Andrea Belotti, still of Torino, who are on course to finish around the same place in Serie A as we have in the Premier League. He’s suffered some minor injuries which have limited his game time. But in the last two seasons, playing in a team that isn’t as stacked with talent, Belotti scored 30 in 72, whereas Lukaku scored 28 in 69 (I’ve only counted league and domestic cup competitions to make it as equal as possible).
Belotti may not be in highest level of centre forwards like Lewandowski, Suarez, Aguero or Kane, but he is a forward who is comfortable in the box and can score all kinds of goals. Something we quite honestly, don’t have.

What this would hopefully set up is a team comfortable on the ball and also uses the full width of the pitch to stretch the opposition, allowing for spaces in key areas. Whether the club adequately backs Solskjaer is a completely different matter. They have been known to balk at investing in players that they don’t feel are worth it, even though they have repeatedly shown a significant lack of football.

The time for a cavalry charge has long passed. What we need now is a whole new army.


Tuesday, 2 April 2019

The Best Films of 2018

It's that time of year, months after everyone else, when I take up two minutes of your time to tell you what were the best seven films of the past year.

Here goes.


7. Black Panther
Writer: Ryan Coogler and Joe Robert Cole
Director: Ryan Coogler

6. First Reformed
Writer: Paul Schrader
Director: Paul Schrader

5. Leave No Trace
Writer: Debra Granik and Anne Rosellini.
Director: Debra Granik

4. Annihilation
Writer: Alex Garland
Director: Alex Garland

3. Cold War
Writer: Pawel Pawlikowski (story and screenplay), Janus Glowacki (screenplay) and Pitor Borkowski (screenplay)
Director: Pawel Pawlikowski

2. Blindspotting
Writer: Rafael Casal and Daveed Diggs
Director: Carlos Lopez Estrada
            
1. Destroyer
Writer: Phil Hay and Matt Manfredi
Director: Karyn Kusama

Monday, 23 April 2018

The Best Films of 2017

It’s that time of the year, where I belatedly weigh in on the films that everyone has long ago ranked and moved on from. Like last year, no comments, just the title, writer and director so you can go in as cold as possible.

Enjoy.

7. The Death of Stalin
Writer: Armando Iannucci (written by), David Schneider (written by), Ian Martin (written by), Fabien Nury & Thierry Robin (comic book)
Director: Armando Iannucci

6. IT
Writer: Chase Palmer (screenplay), Cary Fukunaga (screenplay), Gary Dauberman (screenplay) and Stephen King (novel)
Director: Andy Muschietti

5. Call Me By Your Name
Writer: James Ivory (screenplay), Andre Aciman (novel)
Director: Luca Guadagnino

4. City of Ghosts
Director: Matthew Heineman

3. Get Out
Writer: Jordan Peele
Director: Jordan Peele

2. Dunkirk
Writer: Christopher Nolan
Director: Christopher Nolan

1. Blade Runner 2049
Writer: Hampton Fancher (story & screenplay), Michael Green (screenplay) and Philip K Dick (character from original novel)
Director: Denis Villeneuve

Tuesday, 27 June 2017

Guilty by Association: A case for Man of Steel

With the release of Wonder Woman, the DC Extended Universe (DCEU) has finally delivered its first great film, rightly receiving both critical praise and (at this early stage) serious commercial success, which will hopefully result in at least one sequel. Wonder Woman proved to be the perfect answer to the missteps of both Batman V Superman and Suicide Squad and will hopefully guide the DCEU going forward.

There have been four DCEU films so far. Wonder Woman; an undoubted home run and one of the best comic book films out there. Batman V Superman; a trilogy of films condensed into a tonally chaotic mess that has Batman using guns. Suicide Squad; the lesser of 2016’s two evils and Man of Steel; the film you don’t remember correctly.

But don’t worry, you are not alone.


“Man of Steel is a bumpy ride for sure. But there's no way to stay blind to its wonders.” Peter Travers – Rolling Stone

Because quite simply, Man of Steel is nowhere near as bad as you think it is, if anything, it is guilty by association. Which is being associated with Batman V Superman. It may not belong among the genres greats, but does not deserve the derision it receives.

Before we get to the negative, lets talk about the positive and the parts of the film that worked unequivocally, as the later far outweighs the former.

Krypton. Oh, how that sequence just works, yes there are few strange zoom shots of Jor-El flying a giant dragon/butterfly creature, but other than that, it just gets it right. The film treats Krypton seriously and instantly introduces the smaller character stakes (Jor-El trying to save his son) and the bigger, world stakes (Jor-El trying to save his planet) and continues to ramp them up, right until the final shot. Russell Crowe and Michael Shannon bring their characters to life in such interesting ways that they instil their relationship and the world with so much history, that when he catch up with them later, interacting with Superman, it feels like a direct continuation of Kryptons final moments.

“The casting is impeccable, beginning with Cavill as an uncommonly brooding but refreshingly deep Superman. The script doesn't give him much to say, but it doesn't need to.”  Peter Howell – Toronto Star

While I’ve touched on Crowe and Shannon and what they brought to the film, it’s hard to find a cast member who didn’t deliver in Man of Steel. Like Batman Begins and Superman: The Movie, all of the roles are filed with top level actors and they all bring an immediate history to their roles, especially Kevin Costner, who draws on similar fatherly characters he has played in the past, but brings in a confusion and doubt that we rarely in him as he struggles to come to terms with keeping his son safe, but also helping him become the man he could be.

“[Cavill is] a superb choice for someone who needs to convincingly convey innate modesty, occasional confusion and eventual strength.” Kenneth Turan – LA Times

Henry Cavill takes over the iconic suit, but is the first person since Christopher Reeve to play the character on screen in a different way. This Superman isn’t instantly sure of himself and has doubts over who he is and what he can be. Cavill plays it with frustrated restraint of someone who knows physically what he can do, but knows that he has to keep it secret even though he can’t help but help the people he comes across. Its only when we see him in the suit that he begins to see the man both his fathers hoped he would become, a man sure in his beliefs and someone who wants to do good.

“David S. Goyer's screenplay benefits from Goyer's ambitious script structure, a thing of interwoven flashbacks and memory-triggered leaps into Superman's past.” Michael Phillips – Chicago Tribune

Like the best origin films, it focuses on its central character and keeps the plot under control and Man of Steel does that. After the Kryptonian prologue, the first half of the film follows Clark/Kal-El through the years, much like Batman Begins did with Bruve Wayne, from painful formative moments in childhood, to later points in time closer to he will become where the character discovers important information about himself that inform who he is (The Kryptonian ship in Man of Steel and the League of Shadows training in Batman Begins). The second half then focuses on the threat from Zod and his army as we finally get to see the hero cut loose, for good or bad and discover what he is capable of.

“There’s very little humor or joy in this Superman story.”  Richard Roeper – Chicago Sun Times

The central criticisms that were raised against Man of Steel from its release up to know were, the level and depiction of the destruction during the finale and how Superman didn’t save as many people as he should have and the lack of fun and joy in a story about a character who traditionally has belonged on the brighter side of hero spectrum.

“The crowd at a "Man of Steel" preview the other night exited the theater not excited, not chatty, but quiet, vaguely shellshocked. Was it the ridiculously loud volume levels? Or the pounding inflicted by the most protracted action sequences? Or both?” Michael Phillips – Chicago Tribune

The criticism of the finale is one I can understand as Zack Synder approached the battle between Superman and Zod in a “realistic” way. Buildings collapsed, people died and everything was coated in a ghostly concrete dust, no doubt calling on images and memories from 9/11 and warzones around the globe. For some this imagery could be too much and while it wasn’t upsetting for myself, it would be stupid and cold-hearted to not see that some people could be affected by it. It was no doubt intended, but was it intended to deliberately offend and upset? No. It stayed true to the tone of the world and the story it took place in.

Let’s not forget that the final confrontation is two near-invincible beings knocking twelve bells out of each other in the middle of a densely populated city, where one of the near-invincible beings has made it clear that he is going to kill a lot of innocent people, making them suffer along the way, unless the other near-invincible being stops him. Zod, by this point has lost everything, has nothing to lose and wants to punish Superman as much as he can by hurting the people he has adopted as his own, choosing them over the Kryptonian people. 

Superman is left in a no win situation, no doubt deliberately engineered by Zod, he can either save the people from crumbling remains of Metropolis after the failed terraforming, or go after Zod, the tangible, immediate threat. Unsurprisingly, Superman Zod, without much attention given to the people of Metropolis. While this isn’t a complete misstep, it was a missed opportunity to show off Superman’s full potential. But the fight shows us that this is all new to him, where an when an experienced Superman would have acted differently. The moment that stands out the most for me is the fuel truck that he easily floats over, allowing it to crash into a building. It would have taken nothing for Superman to stop it, but he chooses to avoid it, focusing on himself and Zod, causing needless destruction and putting lives at risk. Even an inexperienced Superman wouldn’t have made this decision, in this moment, he is angry and wants to stop Zod and it would have, at least to me, felt more natural for him to use it as a weapon. But also, this is only second real fight Superman has been in and it is against a much smarter tactician in Zod. Superman making mistakes and learning from them was something that we would have seen looked at and explored in a sequel I’m sure. If we had gotten one that is.

Timing didn’t help this style of finale, a year earlier The Avengers had used a very similar style of climax, where the number of civilian casualties is meant to be dramatically lower, there are several scenes that show The Avengers saving civilians from the alien invaders. I don’t remember seeing any innocents being hurt, never mind killed during The Avengers finale, but in Man of Steel there is undeniably a high body count as the gods do battle in the skies above. I’m not arguing for against either one, both of them fit the tone of the story that has come before and feels like a natural progression and culmination of those stories.

As I mentioned before and what was an important thematic element for the film is that Superman is till coming to terms with who he is and understanding what he is truly capable of. From his discovery of the Kryptonian ship through to the end of the battle in Metropolis, a matter of days pass and while he has tested his powers, he has never been tested on a scale anywhere near what he experiences in the second half of Man of Steel.

Putting the timescale into perspective, within days of finally discovering who you are, an army of your own people turn up and threaten the planet and people that have taken you in and where you have made your choice. Every question you ever wanted to ask to better understand yourself could be answered. Also, there are moments of joy and fun and upbeat, they are just used moderately, in keeping with the tone of the story. Clark learning to fly as his father talks to him (also one of the greatest Superman moments in a film), is a scene steeped in it. Then final scenes where Clark tells Martha that he knows what he is going to do with his life and where we, the audience finally get the feeling that Clark knows who he is and where he belongs.

But in between those moments, is a man trying to come to terms with what he is and who he is, while the fate of the world depends upon the decisions he makes. Realistically, not a situation conducive to a story over flowing with joyful moments, it is a story of inner struggle (and yes, “Gods” knocking each other about) and self-discovery.

I won’t be so blind as to say that nothing could have been done differently or changed for the better, there are few that I regularly think of when Man of Steel pops into my head. I’d have liked to have seen the Superman and Lois scene in the interrogation room go on longer, the hand held style at points didn’t work for me, although that isn’t specific to Man of Steel, it is just a style that I find is very hard to make work. Although it did give Man of Steel a visual style that sets it apart from the rest of the genre. Finally, the finally, for me would have been stronger, if it was a bit shorter, but also if there was more of Henry Cavill and Michael Shannon fighting practically during the finale. I realise with these characters, some aspects just couldn’t have been done, but for me the best parts of the fight is when we get up close and personal with Zod and Superman (like the construction site and the train station).

I’ll drop into spoiler territory for this paragraph. But the way that Superman stops the fight came in for a bit flack, although that was mainly from people arguing “Superman would never kill”, or “Superman wouldn’t do that”. But this is a new Superman in a new world and the threat that he and humanity face is unique, spectacularly aggressive and near unstoppable. The prior battle has shown us what destruction Zod can and will cause and faced with the situation at the end, between Zod and innocents. Superman makes the only choice he could. Zod knew what he was doing, he created the situation, Superman was running out of time and options and made the choice he felt he had to.

Where the character would have gone after he comes to terms with effectively killed off the last his species was a great weight, thread to explore and dive in to in the next film. But it never truly found out the effect this had on Superman and that is perhaps the true cost of getting Batman V Superman, for all the early hype and people exalting that we would finally see the two greatest superheroes meet and fight on the big screen, was that we were denied a true sequel to Man of Steel

While Batman V Superman may have touched on, or used part of these questions or ideas in its film, that was such a wide array of directions they could go in and consequences and developments that could be explored. The ones that were used, but all to sparingly or prematurely dropped was the Senate/House hearings, the developing relationship between Lois and Clark and the world in general adjusting to having a god amongst them. But also, they could looked at the potential religious angle to Superman appearing and the forming of a church or belief structure devoted to him, how world leaders and politicians would respond to a powerful force they can’t control. Hopefully, one day we will get a sequel that puts Superman front and centre again, it may be the upcoming Justice League, but I’m not holding out much hope.

Superman, also wasn’t a financial failure, it made around $668m worldwide, which isn’t bad for a reboot of a character that needed  bringing into the modern world. Batman Begins by comparison made $374m and Iron Man $585m, although they both received more critical praise than Man of Steel, $668m surely shouldn’t have been that bad of a performance to cause Warner Bros. to panic and press the Batman button.

Ultimately, what we got from Batman V Superman was a trilogy of films (Man of Steel 2, a rebooted Batman film and then a Batman/Superman film) which has kneecapped the Man of Steel series and gave us a portrayal of Batman that was closer to The Punisher than Batman. Although, it did give us Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman and that is something to be truly thankful for.

Hopefully, the Wonder Woman team will be given the time, patience and support that The Dark Knight team were given and allowed to make at least one more film that focuses on Diana and her world, it’s rich enough and unique enough to do that, without trying to jam in any other Justice League characters.

So go and see Wonder Woman, if you’ve seen it already, go see it again and let the people in charge know that we want another Wonder Woman film that puts her front and centre. Then, go and watch Man of Steel again. You’ll be surprised.











Saturday, 29 April 2017

The Best Films of 2016

From now on, I'll be keeping it short. I probably don't do the films any favours by trying to describe in a paragraph. In what ultimately comes down to me telling you how good they are. 

Just go and see them.


7. Hell of High Water
Writer: Taylor Sheridan
Director: David Mackenzie

6. Midnight Special
Writer/Director: Jeff Nicholls

5. Hunt for the Wilderpeople
Writer: Taika Waitit, Te Arepa Kahi and Barry Crump (novel)
Director: Taika Waititi

4. Suburra
Writer: Giancarlo De Calato, Carlo Bonini, Sandro Petraglia and Stefano Rulli
Director: Stefano Solima

3. Moonlight
Writer: Barry Jenkins (screenplay) and Tarell Alvin McCraney (story)
Director: Barry Jenkins

2. Tower
Director: Keith Maitland

1. A War
Writer/Director: Tobias Lindholm



Note. Originally, Moana occupied the seventh spot. However, this was before I'd managed to catch up with some of that years award season films.