Monday, 3 June 2013

Star Trek Into Darkness


This review is a little late, but I’ve been a little busy in the last two weeks. I’ll keep this one brief, as Into Darkness has been out for over three weeks now, and its theatrical run will be coming to an end soon.

The first in JJ Abrams rebooted Star Trek  series did what not a lot of people thought you could do. Make a Trek film for this generation, but that also honoured the original series and its ideas, and breathed life into a franchise that had grown stale in the previous decade. The challenge with Into Darkness was to carry on this idea, but to go bigger (as all sequels tend to demand), with more spectacle and to continue to bring us more of the crew that was the undoubted strongest part of the first film.

The plot of Into Darkness, is a relatively straight forward one, as this review will be spoiler free I will keep it brief, a former Star Fleet officer John Harrison (Benedict Cumberbatch) shows up and blows up a building, and generally causes a bit of havoc, which prompts Kirk (Chris Pine) to request to go after him, even though where he has fled to, is a planet they can’t go. See no spoilers.

There are a few twists and turns along way, probably less than in the first film, but this certainly helps the film as it allows us more time with our two leads, Kirk and Spock (Zachary Quinto) as well as giving Harrison a good amount of time to become a very credible threat.

The most interesting part of the film is the Kirk and Spock relationship, which manages to juggle brotherly aspects first, mixed with ethical and moral ideals unique to each character, all done with quick and snappy dialogue that doesn’t bog down or hold the pace of the film back.

The first act and last act are where this relationship is probably seen and emphasised the boast, as its where there individual morals and outlooks on life and their profession are in the spotlight the most, and offers up a few interesting questions about the way they act, and what the other one would have done in a similar situation. The opening rescue mission of the film offers the purest look at the characters views and behaviour patterns, that will go on to be so crucial in the finale.

The only section of the film that could have used some streamlining, was the early Star Fleet section, as regards to the captaincy of the Enterprise. It is convoluted and could have easily been simplified to instead focus on Kirk and his relationships with both Spock and Pike, who is somewhat of father figure to him.

One of the biggest mysteries of the film, prior to release, was who Benedict Cumberbatch would be playing, and I won’t give away anything other than what I already have. What wasn’t going to be a mystery was just how awesome he was going to be, he steals or owns, depending on how you look at it, each scene he is in. Worse than that, he makes it look effortless, knowing exactly when to go big and when to dial it down to a terrifying, single softly spoken word. Specifically referring to his first line to Kirk of “Captain?”. Into Darkness is worth the price of admission for Cumberbatch alone.

It’s a sad day when you realise that the dull and clunky Iron Man 3, has made much more than Into Darkness, and this is coming from someone who isn’t loyal to the Star Trek franchise. So I urge you all to go and change that.

Boldy go where you haven’t been before, basically the cinema to see Star Trek Into Darkness.